نوع مقاله : مقاله ترویجی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه مازندران، مازندران، ایران.
2 کارشناسی ارشد روابط بین الملل گرایش دیپلماسی دفاعی، دانشگاه مالک اشتر تهران، تهران، ایران...
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
In addition to different effects on the countries’ domestic politics, developments of Islamic awakening have had deep effects on the international and regional security environments. Apart from these effects, the more important issue is world actors’ positions on these developments and the related countries; accordingly, the countries according to its national interests and foreign policy objectives have had different and sometimes contradictory orientations towards these developments. The evidence shows that Islamic awakening had considerable effects on political relations among countries including US–Israel strategic alliance as one of firmest bilateral relations in the contemporary world. The question that needs to be asked is that: “what were the effects of Islamic awakening on US – Israel strategic alliance”? The hypothesis is that: “although American and Israeli different conceptions and definitions of the interests and objectives on the Middle Eastern revolutionary developments caused relative divergence, but according to the strategic tie was reproduced, because the common strategic interests became prominent. Research Method in This article is predictor research and gather information through library source.
کلیدواژهها English
منابع فارسی
منابع لاتین
18. Byman, Daniel (2011), ‘‘Israel’s Pessimistic View of the Arab Spring’’, The Washington Quarterly 34, no. 3, Summer.
19. Berti, Benedetta (2013), ‘‘Israel and the Arab Spring: Understanding Attitudes and Responses to the "New Middle East", Al Mesbar Studies & Research Centre and the Foreign Policy Research Institute(FPRI).
20. Dadush, Uri and Dunne, Michele (2011), ‘‘American and European Responses to the Arab Spring: What’s the Big Idea? ”, The Washington Quarterly, Fall.
21. Guzansky, Yoel and Heller, Mark A. (Editors) (2012), ‘‘One Year of the Arab Spring: Global and Regional Implications”, Institute for National Security Studies, Memorandum No. 113, March.
22. Inbar, Efraim (2012), ‘‘Israel’s National Security Amidst Unrest in the Arab World”, The Washington Quarterly, winter.
23. Jett, Dennis (2011), ‘‘U.S. security assistance in the Middle East: helping friends or creating enemies”, Middle East Policy, Vol. XVIII, No 1, Summer.
24. Kahl, Colin H. and Lynch, Marc (2013), ‘‘U.S. Strategy after the Arab Uprisings: Toward Progressive Engagement”, The Washington Quarterly, Spring.
25. Kirshner, Jonathan (2010), ‘‘The tragedy of offensive realism: Classical realism and the rise of China”, European Journal of International Relations, August.
26. Kitchen, Nicholas (2010), Systemic pressures and domestic ideas: a neoclassical realist model of grand strategy formation, Review of International Studies, Vol. 36, January.
27. Lobell, Steven E., Taliaferro, Jeffrey W. and Norrin M. Ripsman (2009), Neoclassical Realism, The State, and Foreign Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Lynch, Marc (2012), ‘‘The Arab Uprising: The Unfinished Revolutions of the New Middle East”, New York: Public Affairs.
29. Malka, Haim (2011), ‘‘Crossroads: The Future of the U.S.-Israel Strategic Partnership”, Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), avalable at: http://csis.org/files/publication/110908_Malka_CrossroadsUSIsrael_Web.pdf.
30. Muhareb, Mahmoud (May 2011), ‘‘Israel and the Egyptian Revolution”, Arab Center for Research & Policy Studies, May, available at: http://english.dohainstitute.orgrelease/35d3de00-35bf-4b6c-be54-323828feec50.
31. Rose, Gideon (1998), Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy, World Politics, Vol. 51, No. 1.
32. Rubin, Barry, ‘‘Arab World: The bad news from Egypt,’’ Jerusalem Post, February 18, 2011,http://www.jpost.com/Features/FrontLines/Article.aspx?id_208741.
33. Schmidt, Brian (2005), Competing Realist Conceptions of Power, Millenium, Journal of International Studies, Vol. 33, No. 3.
34. Schweller, Randall L. (2003), The Progressiveness of Neoclassical Realism”, in: Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field, Colin Elman and Miriam Fendius Elman (eds.), Cambridge: MIT Press.
35. Schweller, Randall L. (2006), Political Constraints on the Balance of Power, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
36. Smith, Steve (2001) “Reflectivist and Constructivist Approaches in International Theory” in Baylis, John and Smith, Steve, The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. Walt, Stephen M. (1998), ‘‘International Relation: One World, Many Theories”, Foreign Policy, No. 110, Spring.
38. Waxman, Dov (2012), ‘‘The Real Problem in U.S.—Israeli Relations”, The Washington Quarterly, Spring.
39. Wohlforth, William (1993), The Elusive Balance, Power and Perceptions during the Cold War, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
40. www.alquds.co.uk/index.asp?code=qf20.3.2011
41. Zakaria, Fareed (1998), From Wealth to Power: The Unusual Origins of America’s World Role, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
