Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript, Available Online from 18 February 2024
Abstract
Hamas attacked Israel on October 7, 2023 in response to more than seven decades of occupation and enduring many injuries and pains. Israel responded to the invasion by trampling all ...
Read More
Hamas attacked Israel on October 7, 2023 in response to more than seven decades of occupation and enduring many injuries and pains. Israel responded to the invasion by trampling all the rules of humanitarian law and attacking civilians, schools and hospitals, several thousand killed women and children and displaced civilians in Gaza.(problem)Various countries, including Turkey, reacted to this conflict. The purpose of writing this article is to explain Erdogan's foreign policy towards this conflict. Therefore, the question of the article is: What is Turkey? Has he adopted a policy regarding the conflict between Hamas and Israel in 2023? The hypothesis of this research, which is tried to be proven with descriptive and analytical (methodology,) is: Turkey's foreign policy towards the conflict between Hamas and Israel in 2023 is based on pragmatism and self-interested political action. In this way, on the one hand, it wants the continuation of relations with Israel in the political, economic and security fields, and on the other hand, it is trying to gain popularity and leadership in the Islamic world by adopting a declaratory policy and supporting rhetoric towards Palestine. The (findings) of this research indicate that It is that despite the tension-causing rhetoric and conflicts such as the Palestinian issue, in practice the relations between Turkey and Israel have maintained relative stability.
The developments in Syria have always been important for the Zionist regime. Accordingly, since the beginning of the Syrian crisis in 2011, the Zionist regime has adopted various military ...
Read More
The developments in Syria have always been important for the Zionist regime. Accordingly, since the beginning of the Syrian crisis in 2011, the Zionist regime has adopted various military and security strategies towards the country. Therefore, the present article seeks to answer the fundamental question: "What are the military and security strategies of the Zionist regime in the face of the Syrian crisis?" (Issue). To answer this question, while collecting data in a library method, a qualitative (descriptive-analytical) method has been used (method). The result is that the Zionist regime, after failing to adopt a unified strategy at the beginning of the Syrian crisis, tried in 2013 to support allied groups in addition to assassinating resistance commanders and bombing their positions, and by persuading the United States to have a more serious presence in Syria. Negotiations with Russia prevent Iran's long-term presence in Syria. Since 2015, Gideon's strategy has been on the agenda of the regime's officials, which is based on the readiness of the army forces to participate in asymmetric wars, increase intelligence aristocracy, and so on. Finally, he pursued the Momentum strategy, which identified the Islamic Republic of Iran as the most important threat to the Zionist advance in Syria. In this strategy, while emphasizing the improvement of the military intelligence unit and equipping the military forces with better weapons, the change in the structure of the army and the formation of the "Command of Iranian Affairs" is emphasized (findings).
